Jeremy Evans cfcb343d37 Fix parallel coverage check ...

The previous approach resulted in rare false positives.  For example,
this run:

```
Coverage report generated for 11 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 48.18% (3951 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 21.42% (467 / 2180)
............................................................................................................................................Coverage report generated for 11, 13 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 59.71% (4896 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 37.48% (817 / 2180)
Coverage report generated for 11, 13, 16 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 71.06% (5827 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 56.61% (1234 / 2180)
Coverage report generated for 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 90.32% (7406 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 84.59% (1844 / 2180)
Coverage report generated for 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 100.0% (8200 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 100.0% (2180 / 2180)
Coverage report generated for 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 to /home/jeremy/code/ubicloud/coverage.
Line Coverage: 90.32% (7406 / 8200)
Branch Coverage: 84.59% (1844 / 2180)
```

Note how the 100% coverage lines are present, but they aren't
the final lines.  This seems like a bug in simplecov's coverage
merging, but this changes the approach to write the turbo_tests
command output to a file, and then check for the
"Line Coverage: 100.0%" and "Branch Coverage: 100.0%" in that
file.

2024-11-08 08:28:41 -08:00

9.4 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

View Raw